Overall Sustainability Score
34
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • WA
Bryn Mawr-Skyway
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Bryn Mawr-Skyway. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
14th
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Bryn Mawr-Skyway
Bryn Mawr-Skyway currently has a sustainability score of 34 (High Pressure) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 14th (weak).
Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (86, increasing) and Utility Pressure (78, stable).
Compared with King County, Bryn Mawr-Skyway is 2.6 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 73 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 19.1% of income with -0.5% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 86 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $7,114 with 4.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 78 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $2,092 with 2.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 64 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 20.1% with 0.7% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 26 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median household income is $124,746 with 2.1% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Bryn Mawr-Skyway
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.