U.S. Cost Pressure by Location

Burden • Change • Offset

Directory

States

State profiles summarize cost pressure and trend direction while linking into deeper county and city-level coverage.

Sustainability Score scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure.

52 State records

Alabama

StateAL

Score 59Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Alaska

StateAK

Score 60Decreasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Arizona

StateAZ

Score 44Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Arkansas

StateAR

Score 68Decreasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

California

StateCA

Score 29Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Colorado

StateCO

Score 39Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Connecticut

StateCT

Score 43Decreasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Delaware

StateDE

Score 50Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

District of Columbia

StateDC

Score 45Decreasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Florida

StateFL

Score 24Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Georgia

StateGA

Score 38Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Hawaii

StateHI

Score 47Decreasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Idaho

StateID

Score 55Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Illinois

StateIL

Score 43Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Indiana

StateIN

Score 59Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Iowa

StateIA

Score 64Decreasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Kansas

StateKS

Score 54Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Kentucky

StateKY

Score 58Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Louisiana

StateLA

Score 51Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Maine

StateME

Score 54Decreasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Maryland

StateMD

Score 45Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Massachusetts

StateMA

Score 32Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Michigan

StateMI

Score 46Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Minnesota

StateMN

Score 45Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Mississippi

StateMS

Score 62Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Missouri

StateMO

Score 60Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Montana

StateMT

Score 49Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Nebraska

StateNE

Score 47Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Nevada

StateNV

Score 35Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

New Hampshire

StateNH

Score 43Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

New Jersey

StateNJ

Score 39Decreasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

New Mexico

StateNM

Score 59Decreasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

New York

StateNY

Score 33Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

North Carolina

StateNC

Score 46Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

North Dakota

StateND

Score 66Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Ohio

StateOH

Score 49Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Oklahoma

StateOK

Score 54Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Oregon

StateOR

Score 33Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Pennsylvania

StatePA

Score 54Decreasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Puerto Rico

StatePR

Score 72Decreasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Rhode Island

StateRI

Score 35Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

South Carolina

StateSC

Score 54Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

South Dakota

StateSD

Score 65Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Tennessee

StateTN

Score 55Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Texas

StateTX

Score 35Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Utah

StateUT

Score 45Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Vermont

StateVT

Score 55Decreasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Virginia

StateVA

Score 41Increasing

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Washington

StateWA

Score 38Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

West Virginia

StateWV

Score 71Stable

Snapshot as of 2024-12-31

Page 1 of 2

Research Path

How To Use State Profiles

Use state pages to establish macro pressure context first, then move into counties and cities for local variance. State-level trends are useful for comparing broad affordability direction before narrowing your shortlist.

Prioritize states with stronger sustainability scores and stable or improving trend direction, then open county and city pages to identify where pressure drivers diverge inside the same state.