Overall Sustainability Score
67
Manageable
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • TX
Aspermont
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Aspermont. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Increasing
National Percentile
89th
Strong
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Aspermont
Aspermont currently has a sustainability score of 67 (Manageable) with a increasing trend direction. National percentile is 89th (strong).
Top current component pressures are Income Offset (89, increasing) and Tax Pressure (40, increasing).
Compared with Stonewall County, Aspermont is 0.8 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 2 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 11.7% of income with -6.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 40 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Median real estate taxes are $872 with 17.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 4 • Trend: Stable
Low Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $613 with -1.1% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 39 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 12.9% with 6.5% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 89 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median household income is $56,875 with -7.1% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Aspermont
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.