Overall Sustainability Score
51
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • OH
Mentor-on-the-Lake
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Mentor-on-the-Lake. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
54th
Mid-Range
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Mentor-on-the-Lake
Mentor-on-the-Lake currently has a sustainability score of 51 (Elevated) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 54th (mid-range).
Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (63, stable) and Utility Pressure (61, increasing).
Compared with Lake County, Mentor-on-the-Lake is 6 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 54 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Owner-cost burden proxy is 16.0% of income with 0.0% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 63 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $3,475 with 2.1% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 61 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $1,113 with 3.7% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 36 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 16.5% with -0.1% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 28 • Trend: Decreasing
Moderate
Median household income is $80,925 with 3.8% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Mentor-on-the-Lake
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.