Overall Sustainability Score
65
Manageable
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
U.S. Cost Pressure by Location
Burden • Change • Offset
City • ND
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Antler. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Overall Sustainability Score
65
Manageable
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
Trend
Increasing
National Percentile
86th
Strong
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
Antler currently has a sustainability score of 65 (Manageable) with a increasing trend direction. National percentile is 86th (strong).
Top current component pressures are Income Offset (39, stable) and Tax Pressure (38, increasing).
Compared with Bottineau County, Antler is 2 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 35 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Owner-cost burden proxy is 12.7% of income with 10.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 38 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Median real estate taxes are $1,393 with 4.3% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 35 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Median gross rent proxy is $796 with 4.3% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 28 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 11.2% with 2.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Pressure Score: 39 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median household income is $85,000 with 1.8% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.