Overall Sustainability Score
48
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • MO
Oakwood Park
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Oakwood Park. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
45th
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Oakwood Park
Oakwood Park currently has a sustainability score of 48 (High Pressure) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 45th (weak).
Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (67, increasing) and Insurance Pressure (65, stable).
Compared with Clay County, Oakwood Park is 5.9 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 65 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 17.0% of income with 0.0% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 67 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $2,941 with 4.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 58 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median gross rent proxy is $1,243 with 1.9% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 36 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 16.9% with -0.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 31 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median household income is $88,468 with 2.7% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Oakwood Park
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.