Overall Sustainability Score
57
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • MI
Crystal Falls
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Crystal Falls. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
68th
Mid-Range
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Crystal Falls
Crystal Falls currently has a sustainability score of 57 (Elevated) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 68th (mid-range).
Top current component pressures are Income Offset (61, decreasing) and Essential Inflation Pressure (53, increasing).
Compared with Iron County, Crystal Falls is 5.8 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 39 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Owner-cost burden proxy is 15.9% of income with -1.9% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 26 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median real estate taxes are $1,467 with 0.5% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 38 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Median gross rent proxy is $716 with 40.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 53 • Trend: Increasing
Elevated
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 15.4% with 34.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 61 • Trend: Decreasing
High Pressure
Median household income is $55,940 with 4.3% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Crystal Falls
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.