Overall Sustainability Score
47
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • IN
Leo-Cedarville
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Leo-Cedarville. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Increasing
National Percentile
43rd
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Leo-Cedarville
Leo-Cedarville currently has a sustainability score of 47 (High Pressure) with a increasing trend direction. National percentile is 43rd (weak).
Top current component pressures are Utility Pressure (60, increasing) and Tax Pressure (55, increasing).
Compared with Allen County, Leo-Cedarville is 4.4 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 51 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Owner-cost burden proxy is 15.3% of income with 1.3% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 55 • Trend: Increasing
Elevated
Median real estate taxes are $1,689 with 8.3% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 60 • Trend: Increasing
Elevated
Median gross rent proxy is $1,021 with 4.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 52 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 17.3% with 1.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 49 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median household income is $70,737 with 2.8% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Leo-Cedarville
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.