Overall Sustainability Score
27
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • FL
Apopka
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Apopka. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Increasing
National Percentile
3rd
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Apopka
Apopka currently has a sustainability score of 27 (High Pressure) with a increasing trend direction. National percentile is 3rd (weak).
Top current component pressures are Utility Pressure (88, increasing) and Essential Inflation Pressure (88, stable).
Compared with Orange County, Apopka is 1.6 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 82 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 19.2% of income with 1.1% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 73 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $2,967 with 6.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 88 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $1,775 with 6.0% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 88 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 26.7% with 2.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 31 • Trend: Decreasing
Moderate
Median household income is $79,719 with 3.5% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Apopka
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.