Overall Sustainability Score
58
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
U.S. Cost Pressure by Location
Burden • Change • Offset
City • DE
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Bethel. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Overall Sustainability Score
58
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
Trend
Decreasing
National Percentile
72nd
Mid-Range
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
Bethel currently has a sustainability score of 58 (Elevated) with a decreasing trend direction. National percentile is 72nd (mid-range).
Top current component pressures are Utility Pressure (56, stable) and Insurance Pressure (49, stable).
Compared with Sussex County, Bethel is 6.6 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 49 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Owner-cost burden proxy is 16.2% of income with -0.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 34 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Median real estate taxes are $1,222 with 4.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 56 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median gross rent proxy is $1,238 with 1.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 42 • Trend: Decreasing
Elevated
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 18.2% with -2.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Pressure Score: 25 • Trend: Decreasing
Moderate
Median household income is $81,497 with 4.3% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.