Overall Sustainability Score
32
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • CA
Arden-Arcade
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Arden-Arcade. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
10th
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Arden-Arcade
Arden-Arcade currently has a sustainability score of 32 (High Pressure) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 10th (weak).
Top current component pressures are Utility Pressure (85, increasing) and Insurance Pressure (80, stable).
Compared with Sacramento County, Arden-Arcade is 2.3 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 80 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 19.7% of income with 0.0% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 74 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $3,921 with 4.1% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 85 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $1,790 with 5.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 77 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 23.3% with 1.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 20 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Median household income is $92,175 with 3.9% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Arden-Arcade
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.