Overall Sustainability Score
42
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • AZ
Lazy Y U
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Lazy Y U. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
31st
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Lazy Y U
Lazy Y U currently has a sustainability score of 42 (High Pressure) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 31st (weak).
Top current component pressures are Essential Inflation Pressure (73, stable) and Insurance Pressure (69, stable).
Compared with Mohave County, Lazy Y U is 4.7 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 69 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 16.7% of income with 1.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 22 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median real estate taxes are $1,238 with 0.7% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 62 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $1,091 with 4.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 73 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 22.7% with 0.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 64 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Median household income is $57,684 with 3.4% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Lazy Y U
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.