Overall Sustainability Score
46
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
City • AK
Knik-Fairview
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Knik-Fairview. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
41st
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Knik-Fairview
Knik-Fairview currently has a sustainability score of 46 (High Pressure) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 41st (weak).
Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (76, increasing) and Insurance Pressure (68, stable).
Compared with Matanuska-Susitna County, Knik-Fairview is 5.6 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 68 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 18.4% of income with -0.5% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 76 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $3,685 with 4.9% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 66 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $1,299 with 3.3% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 35 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 16.6% with -0.5% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 20 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Median household income is $94,031 with 3.8% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Knik-Fairview
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.