Overall Sustainability Score
49
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
County • WI
Marinette County
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Marinette County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Increasing
National Percentile
46th
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Marinette County
Marinette County currently has a sustainability score of 49 (High Pressure) with a increasing trend direction. National percentile is 46th (weak).
Top current component pressures are Income Offset (63, increasing) and Insurance Pressure (53, stable).
Compared with Wisconsin, Marinette County is 7.3 points lower on sustainability (higher overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 53 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Owner-cost burden proxy is 15.2% of income with 0.7% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 45 • Trend: Decreasing
Elevated
Median real estate taxes are $1,907 with -2.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 48 • Trend: Increasing
Elevated
Median gross rent proxy is $795 with 6.1% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 48 • Trend: Increasing
Elevated
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 15.0% with 5.5% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 63 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median household income is $63,809 with 0.6% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Marinette County
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.