Overall Sustainability Score
48
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
County • TX
Gillespie County
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Gillespie County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Decreasing
National Percentile
45th
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Gillespie County
Gillespie County currently has a sustainability score of 48 (High Pressure) with a decreasing trend direction. National percentile is 45th (weak).
Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (75, stable) and Utility Pressure (68, stable).
Compared with Texas, Gillespie County is 12.8 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 46 • Trend: Decreasing
Elevated
Owner-cost burden proxy is 16.1% of income with -9.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 75 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $4,496 with 2.1% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 68 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $1,340 with 0.7% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 55 • Trend: Decreasing
Elevated
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 21.1% with -10.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 16 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Median household income is $76,162 with 12.3% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Gillespie County
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.