Overall Sustainability Score
51
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
County • PR
Añasco County
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Añasco County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
52nd
Mid-Range
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Añasco County
Añasco County currently has a sustainability score of 51 (Elevated) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 52nd (mid-range).
Top current component pressures are Essential Inflation Pressure (84, stable) and Income Offset (76, decreasing).
Compared with Puerto Rico, Añasco County is 21.7 points lower on sustainability (higher overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 18 • Trend: Stable
Low Pressure
Owner-cost burden proxy is 10.2% of income with 0.0% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 50 • Trend: Insufficient data
Elevated
Median real estate taxes are N/A with N/A year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 25 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Median gross rent proxy is $576 with 5.1% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 84 • Trend: Stable
High Pressure
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 28.3% with 1.5% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 76 • Trend: Decreasing
High Pressure
Median household income is $24,436 with 3.6% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Añasco County
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.