Overall Sustainability Score
69
Manageable
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
County • MS
Choctaw County
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Choctaw County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Decreasing
National Percentile
92nd
Very Strong
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Choctaw County
Choctaw County currently has a sustainability score of 69 (Manageable) with a decreasing trend direction. National percentile is 92nd (very strong).
Top current component pressures are Income Offset (61, decreasing) and Tax Pressure (36, increasing).
Compared with Mississippi, Choctaw County is 6.7 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 32 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Owner-cost burden proxy is 13.9% of income with 0.0% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 36 • Trend: Increasing
Moderate
Median real estate taxes are $563 with 19.3% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 8 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $638 with -3.5% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 19 • Trend: Decreasing
Low Pressure
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 15.0% with -8.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 61 • Trend: Decreasing
High Pressure
Median household income is $50,919 with 5.4% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Choctaw County
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.