Overall Sustainability Score
59
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
County • KS
Rush County
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Rush County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Increasing
National Percentile
76th
Strong
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Rush County
Rush County currently has a sustainability score of 59 (Elevated) with a increasing trend direction. National percentile is 76th (strong).
Top current component pressures are Income Offset (73, increasing) and Tax Pressure (49, increasing).
Compared with Kansas, Rush County is 5.1 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 29 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Owner-cost burden proxy is 12.9% of income with 1.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 49 • Trend: Increasing
Elevated
Median real estate taxes are $1,562 with 3.9% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 21 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median gross rent proxy is $711 with 1.6% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 36 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 14.2% with 2.1% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 73 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median household income is $59,970 with -0.5% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Rush County
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.