Overall Sustainability Score
42
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
U.S. Cost Pressure by Location
Burden • Change • Offset
County • KS
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Riley County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Overall Sustainability Score
42
High Pressure
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
Trend
Decreasing
National Percentile
28th
Weak
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
Riley County currently has a sustainability score of 42 (High Pressure) with a decreasing trend direction. National percentile is 28th (weak).
Top current component pressures are Tax Pressure (79, increasing) and Income Offset (59, stable).
Compared with Kansas, Riley County is 12.4 points lower on sustainability (higher overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 44 • Trend: Decreasing
Elevated
Owner-cost burden proxy is 15.8% of income with -3.7% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 79 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median real estate taxes are $3,466 with 4.5% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 54 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median gross rent proxy is $1,046 with -1.8% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Pressure Score: 58 • Trend: Decreasing
Elevated
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 20.5% with -4.3% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Pressure Score: 59 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Median household income is $61,098 with 2.6% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.