Overall Sustainability Score
58
Elevated
Scale: 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure
County • ID
Cassia County
This page summarizes financial pressure dynamics for Cassia County. Cost pressure is modeled as burden plus change minus offsets, then decomposed into standardized pressure components.
Sustainability Score
Latest Snapshot
2024-12-31
Scale direction: Sustainability Score 0 = highest pressure, 100 = lowest pressure. Pressure Score 0 = low pressure, 100 = high pressure.
Trend
Stable
National Percentile
73rd
Mid-Range
Higher percentile is better (less pressure than peers)
Local Narrative
What Is Driving Pressure In Cassia County
Cassia County currently has a sustainability score of 58 (Elevated) with a stable trend direction. National percentile is 73rd (mid-range).
Top current component pressures are Utility Pressure (76, increasing) and Essential Inflation Pressure (58, stable).
Compared with Idaho, Cassia County is 2.6 points higher on sustainability (lower overall pressure).
Pressure Components
Component Breakdown
Higher component score = higher pressure
INSURANCE_PRESSURE
Insurance Pressure
Pressure Score: 21 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Owner-cost burden proxy is 13.7% of income with -1.4% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
TAX_PRESSURE
Tax Pressure
Pressure Score: 32 • Trend: Stable
Moderate
Median real estate taxes are $1,166 with 2.2% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
UTILITY_PRESSURE
Utility Pressure
Pressure Score: 76 • Trend: Increasing
High Pressure
Median gross rent proxy is $1,000 with 8.7% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
ESSENTIAL_INFLATION_PRESSURE
Essential Inflation Pressure
Pressure Score: 58 • Trend: Stable
Elevated
Essential burden proxy (gross rent to income) is 16.9% with 2.9% year-over-year movement.
Open component page
INCOME_OFFSET
Income Offset
Pressure Score: 30 • Trend: Decreasing
Moderate
Median household income is $70,830 with 5.7% year-over-year growth.
Open component page
Research Path
Continue From Cassia County
Use this location profile as the anchor page, then compare component pages and related geographies before finalizing interpretation. Validate assumptions with methodology and source documentation.